Re: signal handlers not linked properly in do_fork()?

From: David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
Date: Sat Oct 28 2000 - 13:49:59 EST

Next message: Pavel Machek: "Re: 2.4.0pre9 and an analog joystick"
Previous message: Matt_Domsch@Dell.com: "RE: PROBLEM: DELL PERC/Megaraid RAID driver in Linux 2.2.18pre17 hang"
In reply to: David Eger: "signal handlers not linked properly in do_fork()?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2000 14:44:03 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Eger <eger@cc.gatech.edu>

I see nowhere else in do_fork() where sig is set, either. What
gives?

fork.c, around line 560:
*p = *current

Later,
David S. Miller
davem@redhat.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Pavel Machek: "Re: 2.4.0pre9 and an analog joystick"
Previous message: Matt_Domsch@Dell.com: "RE: PROBLEM: DELL PERC/Megaraid RAID driver in Linux 2.2.18pre17 hang"
In reply to: David Eger: "signal handlers not linked properly in do_fork()?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 31 2000 - 21:00:23 EST