Followup to: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10010311018180.7083-100000@penguin.transmeta.com>
By author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> Does anybody see any problems with it? Basically, we're sidestepping the
> sorting, because neither SCSI nor USB need it. Making the problem simpler
> is always good.
>
> Now, the above won't work for drivers/net, but I think it will work for
> just about anything else. So let's just leave drivers/net alone for now.
> Simplicity is good.
>
I was going to ask to what extent we genuinely need sorting, and if we
might be better off trying to eliminate that need as much as possible.
-hpa
-- <hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private! "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 31 2000 - 21:00:30 EST