On Wed, 1 Nov 2000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > for microcode update as family=6? The manuals suggest that test for ">" is
> > correct, i.e. that Intel will maintain compatibility with P6 wrt microcode
> > update.
> >
> > Perhaps Richard can clarify this?
>
> Until we know what the preventium IV does on microcode behaviour it seems
> wisest to test for == not >.
Ok, true, I agree with both you and Mikael Pettersson. Also, I couldn't
find where in the volumeIII I saw references to ">", perhaps it wasn't in
the docs but just in some sample Intel implementation (or maybe not).
Regards,
Tigran
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Nov 07 2000 - 21:00:09 EST