Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ?

From: J . A . Magallon (jamagallon@able.es)
Date: Wed Nov 01 2000 - 17:40:58 EST

Next message: Aaron Denney: "Re: working userspace nfs v3 for linux?"
Previous message: Dunlap, Randy: "RE: 3-order allocation failed"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ?"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ?"
Reply: Kurt Garloff: "Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ?"
Maybe reply: Ben Pfaff: "Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ?"
Maybe reply: Wayne.Brown@altec.com: "Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ?"
Maybe reply: Wayne.Brown@altec.com: "Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

I have noticed that in latest patch for 2.4.0, the global Makefile
no more tries to find a kgcc, and falls back to gcc.
I suppose because 2.7.2.3 is no more good for kernel, but still you
can use 2.91, 2.95.2 or 2.96(??). Is that a patch that leaked in
the way to test10, or is for another reason ?.

TIA

-- Juan Antonio Magallon Lacarta mailto:jamagallon@able.es

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Aaron Denney: "Re: working userspace nfs v3 for linux?"
Previous message: Dunlap, Randy: "RE: 3-order allocation failed"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ?"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ?"
Reply: Kurt Garloff: "Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ?"
Maybe reply: Ben Pfaff: "Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ?"
Maybe reply: Wayne.Brown@altec.com: "Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ?"
Maybe reply: Wayne.Brown@altec.com: "Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Nov 07 2000 - 21:00:10 EST