Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page (Updated as of 2.4.0-test10)

From: Jeff Garzik (jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com)
Date: Fri Nov 03 2000 - 18:57:32 EST

Next message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: linux support for TCP/IP Task Offload ...."
Previous message: Gareth Hughes: "Re: SETFPXREGS fix"
In reply to: Andi Kleen: "Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page (Updated as of 2.4.0-test10)"
Next in thread: Andi Kleen: "Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page (Updated as of 2.4.0-test10)"
Reply: Andi Kleen: "Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page (Updated as of 2.4.0-test10)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Andi Kleen wrote:
> de4x5 is stable, but tends to perform badly under load, mostly because
> it doesn't use rx_copybreak and overflows standard socket buffers with its
> always MTU sized skbuffs.

One of the reasons that de4x5 isn't gone already is that I get reports
that de4x5 performs better than the tulip driver for their card.

Jeff

-- 
Jeff Garzik             | Dinner is ready when
Building 1024           | the smoke alarm goes off.
MandrakeSoft            |	-/usr/games/fortune
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: linux support for TCP/IP Task Offload ...."
Previous message: Gareth Hughes: "Re: SETFPXREGS fix"
In reply to: Andi Kleen: "Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page (Updated as of 2.4.0-test10)"
Next in thread: Andi Kleen: "Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page (Updated as of 2.4.0-test10)"
Reply: Andi Kleen: "Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page (Updated as of 2.4.0-test10)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Nov 07 2000 - 21:00:15 EST