Re: ext3 vs. JFS file locations...

From: Dominik Kubla (dominik.kubla@uni-mainz.de)
Date: Sat Nov 04 2000 - 20:46:21 EST

Next message: Andrew Morton: "Re: Locking Between User Context and Soft IRQs in 2.4.0"
Previous message: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: Linux-2.4.0-test10"
In reply to: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: ext3 vs. JFS file locations..."
Next in thread: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: ext3 vs. JFS file locations..."
Reply: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: ext3 vs. JFS file locations..."
Reply: Albert D. Cahalan: "Re: ext3 vs. JFS file locations..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, Nov 03, 2000 at 11:33:10AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
> How about naming it something that doesn't end in -fs, such as
> "journal" or "jfsl" (Journaling Filesystem Layer?)
>

Why? I'd rather rename IBM's jfs to ibmjfs and be done with it.

Yours,
Dominik Kubla

-- 
http://petition.eurolinux.org/index_html - No Software Patents In Europe!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andrew Morton: "Re: Locking Between User Context and Soft IRQs in 2.4.0"
Previous message: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: Linux-2.4.0-test10"
In reply to: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: ext3 vs. JFS file locations..."
Next in thread: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: ext3 vs. JFS file locations..."
Reply: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: ext3 vs. JFS file locations..."
Reply: Albert D. Cahalan: "Re: ext3 vs. JFS file locations..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Nov 07 2000 - 21:00:16 EST