Re: ext3 vs. JFS file locations...

From: Dominik Kubla (dominik.kubla@uni-mainz.de)
Date: Sun Nov 05 2000 - 07:39:28 EST

Next message: bobyetman@att.net: "Loadavg calculation"
Previous message: Russell King: "Re: USB init order dependencies."
In reply to: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: ext3 vs. JFS file locations..."
Next in thread: Albert D. Cahalan: "Re: ext3 vs. JFS file locations..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat, Nov 04, 2000 at 06:48:47PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:

> Because -fs is usually used by filesystems itself. Since the journaling
> layer doesn't really have a publically visible name, it's easy to change.

Oh i understood that fine. But VFS = "virtual filesystem switch" is also
not a filesystem per se. And why give the generic term to an IBM "product"?
So i say leave jfs for generic code and call the IBM jfs "ibmjfs".

Just my 2 cents,
Dominik Kubla

-- 
http://petition.eurolinux.org/index_html - No Software Patents In Europe!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: bobyetman@att.net: "Loadavg calculation"
Previous message: Russell King: "Re: USB init order dependencies."
In reply to: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: ext3 vs. JFS file locations..."
Next in thread: Albert D. Cahalan: "Re: ext3 vs. JFS file locations..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Nov 07 2000 - 21:00:17 EST