Re: Can EINTR be handled the way BSD handles it? -- a plea from a user-land programmer...

From: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru
Date: Mon Nov 06 2000 - 14:37:28 EST

Next message: Robert Kaiser: "Re: setup.S: A20 enable sequence (once again)"
Previous message: Eric W. Biederman: "Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page]"
In reply to: Ulrich Drepper: "Re: Can EINTR be handled the way BSD handles it? -- a plea from a user-land programmer..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hello!

> Glibc has to use signals because there *still* is not mechanism in the
> kernel to allow synchronization.

Could you tell why does it use SA_INTERRUPT on its internal signals?

Alexey
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Robert Kaiser: "Re: setup.S: A20 enable sequence (once again)"
Previous message: Eric W. Biederman: "Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page]"
In reply to: Ulrich Drepper: "Re: Can EINTR be handled the way BSD handles it? -- a plea from a user-land programmer..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Nov 07 2000 - 21:00:20 EST