Re: USB init order dependencies.

• Next message: Zephaniah E. Hull: "Re: Linux-2.4.0-test10"
• Previous message: Jeff V. Merkey: "sendmail has low memory problems on 2.4.0 - Working Sets Required?"
• In reply to: Russell King: "Re: USB init order dependencies."
• Next in thread: Dunlap, Randy: "RE: USB init order dependencies."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

rmk@arm.linux.org.uk said:
> No. As I said elsewhere in this thread, the USB OHCI chip is not
> accessible until other board-specific initialisation has happened.
> This is done via an initcall. Unfortunately, moving usb_init() back
> into init/main.c will mean that USB is again initialised before any
> initcalls, which means for these boards USB will be non-functional
> without additional changes over and above just moving usb_init().

But OHCI init isn't called from usb_init() is it?

The proposal is only to move the single call to usb_init() back into
init/main.c - not to move all the USB initcalls back.

--
dwmw2
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Zephaniah E. Hull: "Re: Linux-2.4.0-test10"
• Previous message: Jeff V. Merkey: "sendmail has low memory problems on 2.4.0 - Working Sets Required?"
• In reply to: Russell King: "Re: USB init order dependencies."
• Next in thread: Dunlap, Randy: "RE: USB init order dependencies."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Nov 07 2000 - 21:00:23 EST