> This way all should work. However someone mentioned that the returns
> from "malloc" should be unique. Why would that be? That would prohibit
> my "1" trick. The statement implies you want to go about checking
> pointers for equality. If for example you have a memcmp (a, b) that
> has "if (a == b) return 0;" at the beginning. That would be allowed
> for the NIL pointers. (all malloc-0 results SHOULD compare equal
> anyway: there are 0 differences....)
It's a SuSv2 thing:
"Upon successful completion with size not equal to 0, malloc() returns a
pointer to the allocated space. If size is 0, either a null pointer or a
unique pointer that can be successfully passed to free() will be returned.
Otherwise, it returns a null pointer and sets errno to indicate the error."
DS
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Nov 07 2000 - 21:00:24 EST