newbie Q:unnecessarily included header files ?

• Next message: Gnea: "240t11p6: NTFS broken (again? :) )"
• Previous message: Dan Aloni: "Re: [PATCH (2.4)] atomic use count for proc_dir_entry"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi,
        if drivers in the tree still compile (and work) after removing
some #include -s does it mean that they don't need them at all?
        May they fail to compile on other arch -s ?

     For instance vgacon.c includes among others fs.h which it seems
never to use.I could send a patch for it.
        
Are these frequent in the tree?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Gnea: "240t11p6: NTFS broken (again? :) )"
• Previous message: Dan Aloni: "Re: [PATCH (2.4)] atomic use count for proc_dir_entry"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 23 2000 - 21:00:12 EST