Re: patch: loop remapper

• Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: ORACLE and 2.4-test10"
• Previous message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: who's maintaning vgacon.c ?"
• In reply to: Jens Axboe: "patch: loop remapper"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Jens Axboe wrote:
>
<snip>
>
> The builtin transfer functions (none and xor) work with the changes,
> but external crypto additions may not. The reason is that the raw
> buf and loop buf passed to them can now be identical (the previous
> version always used getblk() to get a new buffer to work on).
>
<snip>

The crypto-api from the international kernel patch has recently defined
that the encryption functions contained in it must be able to encrypt
in-place. This maps directly to the loop-gen driver, so I don't see a
problem here. (Other than that there is no real patch-int-2.4.x out
there yet). However, the ciphers have not been checked to conform to
that definition.

Marc

-- 
Marc Mutz <Marc@Mutz.com>     http://EncryptionHOWTO.sourceforge.net/
University of Bielefeld, Dep. of Mathematics / Dep. of Physics
PGP-keyID's:   0xd46ce9ab (RSA), 0x7ae55b9e (DSS/DH)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: ORACLE and 2.4-test10"
• Previous message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: who's maintaning vgacon.c ?"
• In reply to: Jens Axboe: "patch: loop remapper"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 23 2000 - 21:00:13 EST