Richard B. Johnson writes:
> It's Intel assembly on Intel machines. It's a hell of a lot more
> readable than AT&T assembly. This stuff has to be set up before you
> have any resources necessary to execute the output of a 'C' compiler,
> so, if you are looking for 'C' syntax, you are out of luck.
Hello Dick!
Come in!
I don't care about what style of assembly it is. Believe it or not,
this may come as a dramatic revelation to you, but not every single
person on this planet knows X86 assembler of any form.
I am one of the lucky people who doesn't have his brain crambed full
of the intracies of such a language. Instead I have my brain full of
ARM assembler instead, which is a hell of a lot more readable than
X86 assembler.
Therefore, you quoting bits of X86 assembler to me is meaningless.
-EAGAIN (try again)
_____
|_____| ------------------------------------------------- ---+---+-
| | Russell King rmk@arm.linux.org.uk --- ---
| | | | http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html / / |
| +-+-+ --- -+-
/ | THE developer of ARM Linux |+| /|\
/ | | | --- |
+-+-+ ------------------------------------------------- /\\\ |
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 23 2000 - 21:00:14 EST