EXPORT_NO_SYMBOLS vs. (null) ?

From: Jeff Garzik (jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com)
Date: Sat Nov 18 2000 - 00:15:35 EST

Next message: David Ford: "Re: test11-pre6 still very broken"
Previous message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: BUG: isofs broken (2.2 and 2.4)"
Next in thread: Keith Owens: "Re: EXPORT_NO_SYMBOLS vs. (null) ?"
Reply: Keith Owens: "Re: EXPORT_NO_SYMBOLS vs. (null) ?"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: EXPORT_NO_SYMBOLS vs. (null) ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

What is the difference between a module that exports no symbols and
includes EXPORT_NO_SYMBOLS reference, and such a module that lacks
EXPORT_NO_SYMBOLS?

Alan once upbraided me for assuming they were the same :)

-- 
Jeff Garzik             |
Building 1024           | The chief enemy of creativity is "good" sense
MandrakeSoft            |          -- Picasso
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: David Ford: "Re: test11-pre6 still very broken"
Previous message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: BUG: isofs broken (2.2 and 2.4)"
Next in thread: Keith Owens: "Re: EXPORT_NO_SYMBOLS vs. (null) ?"
Reply: Keith Owens: "Re: EXPORT_NO_SYMBOLS vs. (null) ?"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: EXPORT_NO_SYMBOLS vs. (null) ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 23 2000 - 21:00:15 EST