Re: EXPORT_NO_SYMBOLS vs. (null) ?

From: Rogier Wolff (R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl)
Date: Sat Nov 18 2000 - 12:40:07 EST


Alan Cox wrote:
> > What is the difference between a module that exports no symbols and
> > includes EXPORT_NO_SYMBOLS reference, and such a module that lacks
> > EXPORT_NO_SYMBOLS?
> >
> > Alan once upbraided me for assuming they were the same :)
>
> EXPORT_NO_SYMBOLS - nothing exported
> MODULE_foo - export specific symbol
>
> none of the above, export all globals but without modvers
                                ^^^^^^^ and statics!!!!

I consider that a bug, but...

                                Roger.

-- 
** R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl ** http://www.BitWizard.nl/ ** +31-15-2137555 **
*-- BitWizard writes Linux device drivers for any device you may have! --*
* There are old pilots, and there are bold pilots. 
* There are also old, bald pilots. 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 23 2000 - 21:00:15 EST