Re: Linux 2.4.0test11-ac1

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Wed Nov 22 2000 - 11:47:31 EST


> APICs (probably due to the fact there was no standalone I/O APIC chip
> available at that time) so CPUs report no APIC flag. And it starts in the
> PIC mode as opposed to the Virtual Wire. I may send you his bootstrap log
> if you want to (but not today -- I don't have it handy).

Ok. That means my check is over zealous.

> Could you please tell me what these broken boards report in MP-tables
> when there is no APIC? Maybe we could find a way to distinguish them.
> All 82489DX-based boards I've met report 0x1 as the APIC revision (I don't
> think there are higher 82489DX revisions).

I think it reports 1.1 apics from memory. Its simply hardcoded in the bios
rather than the configurable flash area.

The following change should make all of this work

        if(vendor!=INTEL && !has_apic)
                /* No SMP */

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 23 2000 - 21:00:23 EST