Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = 0"

From: Andrea Arcangeli (andrea@suse.de)
Date: Mon Nov 27 2000 - 19:28:36 EST

Next message: Peter Samuelson: "Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = 0""
Previous message: Andries Brouwer: "Re: access() says EROFS even for device files if /dev is mounted RO"
In reply to: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = 0""
Next in thread: kumon@flab.fujitsu.co.jp: "Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = 0""
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 02:34:45PM -0500, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
> The following shell-script shows that gcc-2.8.1 produces code with
> data allocations adjacent. However, they are reversed!

same with 2.95.* :).

Andrea
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Peter Samuelson: "Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = 0""
Previous message: Andries Brouwer: "Re: access() says EROFS even for device files if /dev is mounted RO"
In reply to: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = 0""
Next in thread: kumon@flab.fujitsu.co.jp: "Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = 0""
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 30 2000 - 21:00:18 EST