On Mon, 4 Dec 2000, Ivan Passos wrote:
> Hello,
[snip details...]
> I'm willing to go for this implementation, but I wanted to know first:
> - whether ifconfig is the right place to do it;
I would like to note an objection to using ifconfig to carry all of this.
For example I do not use or even have ifconfig on any of my systems as I
only use/need/want Alexey's ip utility to perform all of those tasks.
I would rather have an independant utility that could set and check the
settings of all of these variables for whatever classes of networking
connections existed. This would provide a cleaner split between the
protocol configuration (IPv4, IPv6, IPX, ...) and the device (V.##,
10/100, 4/16/100, etc) parameters.
Such a split should make for a cleaner configuration structure WRT virtual
devices as well which for the most part deal with the protocol config and
do not need much device config.
FWIW: Alexey's ip has replaced both ifconfig and route on my systems.
Something that could now replace having several different card config
utils around with one binary would be fantastic.
> - where I should create the new ioctl's to handle these new parameters.
>
> Suggestions / comments are more than welcome.
>
> Later,
> Ivan
Thanks! I will volunteer to test/break/etc as my coding skills verge
beyond ludicrous.
--------------------------------------------------
Matthew G. Marsh, President
Paktronix Systems LLC
1506 North 59th Street
Omaha NE 68104
Phone: (402) 932-7250
Email: mgm@paktronix.com
WWW: http://www.paktronix.com
--------------------------------------------------
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Dec 07 2000 - 21:00:13 EST