>
> I have a vested interest in how this all turns out. I own a Packet Over SONET
> device driver for our OC-12 and OC-48 NICs that I currently pass all parameters
> to the driver via arguments on the insmod. To avoid lengthy commands, we
> provide the common defaults. We accept some basic ifconfig input, but with
> SONET/SDH and chip specific items that needed to be controlled, ifconfig did not
> seem the way to go.
Ditto, we have an adsl driver that we setup by overloading various otherwise
unused options in ifconfig (mem_start, io_addr etc) to do this. Cheaper and
faster than writing yet another ioctl using device configuration agent, but
distasteful non the less.
Some generic way to pass configuration data using a generic configuration
agent to network (and other) drivers would be interesting.
> > > I'm willing to go for this implementation, but I wanted to know first:
> > > - whether ifconfig is the right place to do it;
> > > - where I should create the new ioctl's to handle these new parameters.
> >
> > I think a new ioctl would be sensible. There is a lot to go in it.
--
__O
Fireplug - a Lineo company _-\<,_
PGP Fingerprint: 28 E2 A0 15 99 62 9A 00 (_)/ (_) 88 EC A3 EE 2D 1C 15 68
Stuart Lynne <sl@fireplug.net> www.lineo.com 604-461-7532
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Dec 07 2000 - 21:00:14 EST