On Sun, 10 Dec 2000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Is it "obvious" that I'm dealing with the same or similar kind of
> > bugginess here?
>
> Obvious no, but its a pretty good guess.
FWIW, I now get:
-------------------------------------
neale@gull:~$ cat /proc/apm
1.13 1.1 0x03 0xff 0xff 0xff -1% -1 ?
-------------------------------------
> > That being the case, any reason I can't/shouldn't put in a function
> > similar to apm_battery_horked(), and call/run it based on a config-time
> > variable?
>
> None at all
Diff against unmolested 2.2.18pre24 is attached.
Obviously the next challenge is to figure out how I can get what
information out of this strange beastie.
Regards,
Neale.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Dec 15 2000 - 21:00:23 EST