Alexander Viro wrote:
>
> On Sun, 17 Dec 2000, Jorg de Jong wrote:
>
> > > >On 13 Dec 2000, Henrik [ISO-8859-1] St�rner wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Just to add a "me too" on this. I didn't report when I saw it last week,
> >
> > I'd like to second that. ME TOO !
> > Since I switched to 2.4.0.test12 I again have the innd bug.
> > ( well at least the same symptoms !)
>
> I.e. old contents resurfacing in active?
I tryed your test program and got correct results, a file with bytes 11-16385 being zero.
I will try to give a description of my problems:
after a reboot inn is 're-using' existing messages to store new
messages. It seems that after a renumber command the active file
is correced again. I have not checked to see if the active file
was corrutped before.
I am using a plain stock kernel, no other patches what so ever,
but am using LVM.
The blocksize the ext2 filesystem is using is 1024.
-- Jorg de Jong Work : mailto:jorg.de.jong@ict.nl Play : mailto:j.e.s.de.jong@freeler.nl - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Dec 23 2000 - 21:00:21 EST