Re: [RFC] prevention of syscalls from writable segments, breaking bug exploits

From: Gerhard Mack (gmack@innerfire.net)
Date: Wed Jan 03 2001 - 19:34:25 EST

Next message: David Brownell: "Re: usb dc2xx quirk"
Previous message: Jens Axboe: "Re: Loopback filesystem still hangs on 2.4.0-test13-pre7"
In reply to: Dan Hollis: "Re: [RFC] prevention of syscalls from writable segments, breaking bug exploits"
Next in thread: Dan Hollis: "Re: [RFC] prevention of syscalls from writable segments, breaking bug exploits"
Reply: Dan Hollis: "Re: [RFC] prevention of syscalls from writable segments, breaking bug exploits"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Dan Hollis wrote:

> On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Gerhard Mack wrote:
> > Your comparing actual security with stack guarding? Stack guarding mearly
> > makes the attack diffrent.. rootkits are already available to defeat it.
>
> url?

Ugh do you have any idea how hard it is to find 2 year old exploits?

Heres the best I could find on short notice:

http://www.insecure.org/sploits/non-executable.stack.problems.html
http://darwin.bio.uci.edu/~mcoogan/bugtraq/msg00335.html

-- Gerhard Mack

gmack@innerfire.net

<>< As a computer I find your faith in technology amusing.

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: David Brownell: "Re: usb dc2xx quirk"
Previous message: Jens Axboe: "Re: Loopback filesystem still hangs on 2.4.0-test13-pre7"
In reply to: Dan Hollis: "Re: [RFC] prevention of syscalls from writable segments, breaking bug exploits"
Next in thread: Dan Hollis: "Re: [RFC] prevention of syscalls from writable segments, breaking bug exploits"
Reply: Dan Hollis: "Re: [RFC] prevention of syscalls from writable segments, breaking bug exploits"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 07 2001 - 21:00:17 EST