On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 01:08:01AM +0100, Peter Osterlund wrote:
> What do you think about the following patch? It also works for all the
> tests mentioned in my previous message.
I'm worried somebody needed to disable LP_CAREFUL to print, probably it's not a
big deal to keep it. About the lp_wait_ready that's what I had in mind with the
"rework" thing and it looks fine. However parport_write can still could silenty
discard data, but maybe it can't notice errors with some handshake. I didn't
checked the details of the DMA based handshake so Tim needs to comment if
this can be considered a final/right fix (I hope it's not ;).
Andrea
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 07 2001 - 21:00:17 EST