Re: So, what about kwhich on RH6.2?

From: Andrew Morton (andrewm@uow.edu.au)
Date: Thu Jan 04 2001 - 03:13:58 EST

Next message: Darryl Miles: "Re: Abort x86 assemble code"
Previous message: Daniel Phillips: "Re: Journaling: Surviving or allowing unclean shutdown?"
In reply to: Pete Zaitcev: "So, what about kwhich on RH6.2?"
Next in thread: Andi Kleen: "Re: So, what about kwhich on RH6.2?"
Reply: Andi Kleen: "Re: So, what about kwhich on RH6.2?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Silly question:

can't we just hardwire `kgcc' into the build system and be done
with all this kwhich stuff? It's just a symlink....

-
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Darryl Miles: "Re: Abort x86 assemble code"
Previous message: Daniel Phillips: "Re: Journaling: Surviving or allowing unclean shutdown?"
In reply to: Pete Zaitcev: "So, what about kwhich on RH6.2?"
Next in thread: Andi Kleen: "Re: So, what about kwhich on RH6.2?"
Reply: Andi Kleen: "Re: So, what about kwhich on RH6.2?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 07 2001 - 21:00:17 EST