Re: Coppermine is a PIII or a Celeron?

From: J . A . Magallon (jamagallon@able.es)
Date: Mon Jan 08 2001 - 09:12:34 EST

Next message: Alexander Viro: "Re: ramfs problem... (unlink of sparse file in "D" state)"
Previous message: Matti Aarnio: "Re: [PATCH] tulip"
In reply to: Giacomo Catenazzi: "Re: Coppermine is a PIII or a Celeron?"
Next in thread: Erik Mouw: "Re: Coppermine is a PIII or a Celeron?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 2001.01.08 Giacomo Catenazzi wrote:
>
> Thus the older Celerons should be compiled with CONFIG_M686 (Pentium
> Pro),
> but the Celeron Coppermine can be compiled with CONFIG_M686FXSR (Pentium
> III), right?
> In this case we should update the files Configure.help and the config.in
> files.
>

I am not an expert on arch codenames, models and so on. Perhaps you should
launch a more specific question onto the list and see what happens...

-- J.A. Magallon $> cd pub mailto:jamagallon@able.es $> more beer

Linux werewolf 2.4.0-ac3 #2 SMP Sun Jan 7 02:13:37 CET 2001 i686

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alexander Viro: "Re: ramfs problem... (unlink of sparse file in "D" state)"
Previous message: Matti Aarnio: "Re: [PATCH] tulip"
In reply to: Giacomo Catenazzi: "Re: Coppermine is a PIII or a Celeron?"
Next in thread: Erik Mouw: "Re: Coppermine is a PIII or a Celeron?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 15 2001 - 21:00:17 EST