On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Wayne Whitney wrote:
> Well, here is a workload that performs worse on 2.4.0 than on 2.2.19pre,
> The typical machine is a dual Intel box with 512MB RAM and 512MB swap.
How does 2.4 perform when you add an extra GB of swap ?
2.4 keeps dirty pages in the swap cache, so you will need
more swap to run the same programs...
Linus: is this something we want to keep or should we give
the user the option to run in a mode where swap space is
freed when we swap in something non-shared ?
regards,
Rik
-- Virtual memory is like a game you can't win; However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose...http://www.surriel.com/ http://www.conectiva.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com.br/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 15 2001 - 21:00:18 EST