On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 02:37:47PM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote:
> Once we are sure 2.4 is stable for just about anybody I
> will submit some of the really trivial enhancements for
> inclusion; all non-trivial patches I will maintain in a
> VM bigpatch, which will be submitted for inclusion around
> 2.5.0 and should provide one easy patch for those distribution
> vendors who think 2.4 VM performance isn't good enough for
> them ;)
Hmm, could you instead follow Andreas approach and have a
directory with little patches, that do _exactly_ one thing and a
file along to describe what is related, dependend and what each
patch does?
So people could try to suit them to their needs.
And they can tell you exactly _what_ change breaks instead of "It
doesn't work".
Thanks & Regards
Ingo Oeser
-- 10.+11.03.2001 - 3. Chemnitzer LinuxTag <http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/linux/tag> <<<<<<<<<<<< come and join the fun >>>>>>>>>>>> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 15 2001 - 21:00:19 EST