sym-2.1.0-20001230 vs. sg (cdrecord)

From: Boszormenyi Zoltan (zboszor@externet.hu)
Date: Thu Jan 11 2001 - 09:11:49 EST

Next message: Rafael E. Herrera: "Re: bugreporting script - second try"
Previous message: Troels Walsted Hansen: "RE: [PATCH] klogd busy loop on zero byte (output from 3c59x driver)"
Next in thread: Gérard Roudier: "Re: sym-2.1.0-20001230 vs. sg (cdrecord)"
Reply: Gérard Roudier: "Re: sym-2.1.0-20001230 vs. sg (cdrecord)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi!

I just wanted to let you know that I successfully ruined
a CD with 2.4.0 + sym-2.1.0-20001230. The system is a RH 7.0
with glibc-2.2-9, cdrecord-1.9.

When will it be really usable?

Regards,
Zoltan Boszormenyi

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Rafael E. Herrera: "Re: bugreporting script - second try"
Previous message: Troels Walsted Hansen: "RE: [PATCH] klogd busy loop on zero byte (output from 3c59x driver)"
Next in thread: Gérard Roudier: "Re: sym-2.1.0-20001230 vs. sg (cdrecord)"
Reply: Gérard Roudier: "Re: sym-2.1.0-20001230 vs. sg (cdrecord)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 15 2001 - 21:00:30 EST