Followup to: <14942.48157.259491.78067@pizda.ninka.net>
By author: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> Lars Marowsky-Bree writes:
> > This just goes on to show that khttpd is unnecessary kernel bloat
> > and can be "just as well" handled by a userspace application, minus
> > some rather very special cases which do not justify its inclusion
> > into the main kernel.
>
> My take on this is that khttpd is unmaintained garbage.
>
> TUX is evidence that khttpd can be done properly and
> beat the pants off of anything done in userspace.
>
Then why don't we unload khttpd and put in Tux?
-hpa
-- <hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private! "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 15 2001 - 21:00:33 EST