Re: The latest instance in the A20 farce

From: H. Peter Anvin (hpa@transmeta.com)
Date: Mon Jan 15 2001 - 15:00:36 EST

Next message: Matti Aarnio: "Re: MTRR type AMD Duron/intel ?"
Previous message: Albert D. Cahalan: "Re: 2.4.0-x features ?"
In reply to: Albert D. Cahalan: "Re: The latest instance in the A20 farce"
Next in thread: Dunlap, Randy: "RE: The latest instance in the A20 farce"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

"Albert D. Cahalan" wrote:
>
> It looks like we let Microsoft fill the design guide void.
> If you were to write "PC DESIGN GUIDE - For the Linux Operating
> System" and a pile of test code, then there would be an
> alternative to point people at.
>
> Complaining is pretty useless.

I was thinking about this today. If we write a Linux design guide, even
as a delta spec, does anyone think it will be listed to?

-hpa

-- 
<hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Matti Aarnio: "Re: MTRR type AMD Duron/intel ?"
Previous message: Albert D. Cahalan: "Re: 2.4.0-x features ?"
In reply to: Albert D. Cahalan: "Re: The latest instance in the A20 farce"
Next in thread: Dunlap, Randy: "RE: The latest instance in the A20 farce"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 15 2001 - 21:00:41 EST