Re: Minors remaining in Major 10 ??

From: Jens Axboe (axboe@suse.de)
Date: Sat Jan 20 2001 - 19:42:21 EST

Next message: Michael Lindner: "Re: PROBLEM: select() on TCP socket sleeps for 1 tick even if data available"
Previous message: Chris Wedgwood: "Re: PROBLEM: select() on TCP socket sleeps for 1 tick even if data available"
In reply to: Andre Hedrick: "Re: Minors remaining in Major 10 ??"
Next in thread: Andre Hedrick: "Re: Minors remaining in Major 10 ??"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat, Jan 20 2001, Andre Hedrick wrote:
> The idea is to have a char not a block because there is no buffered access
> to the dummy driver. It is very painful to have to open one block device
> and pass parameters to select the one you really want to service in a
> passive mode.

Like the raw devices we have already?

-- 
* Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
* SuSE Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Michael Lindner: "Re: PROBLEM: select() on TCP socket sleeps for 1 tick even if data available"
Previous message: Chris Wedgwood: "Re: PROBLEM: select() on TCP socket sleeps for 1 tick even if data available"
In reply to: Andre Hedrick: "Re: Minors remaining in Major 10 ??"
Next in thread: Andre Hedrick: "Re: Minors remaining in Major 10 ??"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 23 2001 - 21:00:23 EST