Re: VIA chipset discussion

From: Howard Johnson (merlin@mwob.org.uk)
Date: Mon Jan 22 2001 - 03:54:18 EST

Next message: Philipp Matthias Hahn: "Re: Firewall netlink question..."
Previous message: Bernd Eckenfels: "Re: the remount problem [2.4.0] kind of solved [patch]"
In reply to: Vojtech Pavlik: "Re: VIA chipset discussion"
Next in thread: Matthew Fredrickson: "Re: VIA chipset discussion"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 03:53:33PM +0100, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 11:42:25PM +0000, Howard Johnson wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 06:32:39PM -0500, John O'Donnell wrote:
> > > Matthew Fredrickson wrote:
>
> My bet is ACPI/powermanagement messing with it ...

Ah, APM. So often blamed. So often the cause. ;-)

Yep, pulling APM support out of my kernel seems to have fixed the problem. I'll
start playing with APM settings, then.

Cheers.

-- 
Howard Johnson
merlin@mwob.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Philipp Matthias Hahn: "Re: Firewall netlink question..."
Previous message: Bernd Eckenfels: "Re: the remount problem [2.4.0] kind of solved [patch]"
In reply to: Vojtech Pavlik: "Re: VIA chipset discussion"
Next in thread: Matthew Fredrickson: "Re: VIA chipset discussion"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 23 2001 - 21:00:25 EST