Re: vfat <-> vfat copying of ~700MB file, so slow!

From: Eric Lammerts (eric@lammerts.org)
Date: Wed Jan 24 2001 - 16:50:07 EST

Next message: Jonathan Earle: "RE: [UPDATE] Zerocopy patches, against 2.4.1-pre10"
Previous message: Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer: "Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy patches, against 2.4.1-pre10"
In reply to: Brad Felmey: "Re: vfat <-> vfat copying of ~700MB file, so slow!"
Next in thread: Albert D. Cahalan: "Re: vfat <-> vfat copying of ~700MB file, so slow!"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Brad Felmey wrote:
> > I/O support = 0 (default 16-bit)
>
> hdparm -c1 /dev/hda, or are you running in 16-bit mode on purpose?

The -c option is only relevant for PIO modes. In this case DMA was on,
so it doesn't make any difference.

Eric

-- Eric Lammerts <eric@lammerts.org> | The best way to accelerate a computer http://www.lammerts.org | running Windows is at 9.8 m/s^2.

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jonathan Earle: "RE: [UPDATE] Zerocopy patches, against 2.4.1-pre10"
Previous message: Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer: "Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy patches, against 2.4.1-pre10"
In reply to: Brad Felmey: "Re: vfat <-> vfat copying of ~700MB file, so slow!"
Next in thread: Albert D. Cahalan: "Re: vfat <-> vfat copying of ~700MB file, so slow!"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 31 2001 - 21:00:20 EST