Alex wrote:
> Regarding Hotmail.. has anybody actually tried informing them that Cisco has a
> stable patch available? It's possible they're just misinformed about its
> status. I do think they should at least be given credit for:
Hotmail actually, as whole M$, is unreachable, so no1 could tell it `em.
> I think the point of a test address is that this could conceivably
> affect more providers than just Hotmail, and it would be useful for people to
> be able to check to make sure their own provider isn't also ECN brain damaged
> so they can yell at them and maybe get the problem fixed before it happens
> instead of just suddenly not getting list mail one day..
Correct - and additionally: what's about Win 95-ME, NT, W2K; *BSD?
When I'm end user they don't block an ECN connection I thought, or do they?
Idea: some1 makes up a web server.
- If I can connect ECN is working
- On the site I can enter my mail addy and get a mail there. If it arrives, everything is ok.
mirabilos
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12+custom(^=href;C-style-comments)
GO/S dx@ s--: a--->---- C++ UL++++ P--- L++$(-^lang) E----/joe W+(++)
N? o K? w-(+$) O+>+++ M-- V- PS+++@ PE(--) Y+ PGP t+ 5? X+ R+ !tv!----
b++++* DI- D+ G(>++) e(^age) h! r(-) y--(!y+) /* lang=NASM, GW-BASIC, C */
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 31 2001 - 21:00:22 EST