Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN

From: Jamie Lokier (lk@tantalophile.demon.co.uk)
Date: Fri Jan 26 2001 - 10:34:30 EST


Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> If connect() suddenly did two connection attempts instead of one, just how
> many timeouts might that break?

Timeouts are already broken by applications that repeatedly call
connect(). You'd get better timeout behaviour by letting the kernel
enforce backoff.

> > Why? The connection is dead, but there is nothing to prevent attempting
> > another connection.
>
> Right. And thats why connect() returns an error and retries are handled in
> userspace.

And this is fine. Can we be permitted to handle a retry in userspace
without fancy options (ECN, SACK, large windows etc.)?

-- Jamie
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 31 2001 - 21:00:25 EST