Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN

From: Rogier Wolff (R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl)
Date: Sat Jan 27 2001 - 05:00:15 EST

H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> "David S. Miller" wrote:
> >
> > H. Peter Anvin writes:
> > > Last I communicated with them, I looked for a reference like that in the
> > > standards RFCs so I could quote chapter and verse at the Hotmail people,
> > > but I couldn't find it.
> >
> > RFC793, where is lists the unused flag bits as "reserved".
> > That is pretty clear to me. It just has to say that
> > they are reserved, and that is what it does.
> >
>
> Is the definition of "reserved" defined anywhere? In a lot of specs,
> "reserved" means MBZ.

MBZ? Must Be Zero?

Reserved means MBZ on things you generate, to guarantee you'll get
expected behaviour from the other side. But in no circumstance should
a reserved bit being non-zero confuse you. They should be
ignored. That leads to the "new" implementations knowing what the old
implementations will do.

                        Roger. 

-- 
** R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl ** http://www.BitWizard.nl/ ** +31-15-2137555 **
*-- BitWizard writes Linux device drivers for any device you may have! --*
* There are old pilots, and there are bold pilots. 
* There are also old, bald pilots. 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 31 2001 - 21:00:27 EST