Re: 2.4 cpu usage...

From: Pavel Machek (pavel@suse.cz)
Date: Fri Jan 26 2001 - 12:18:35 EST

Next message: Pavel Machek: "Re: NTFS safety and lack thereof - Was: Re: Linux 2.4.0ac11"
Previous message: Andrew Morton: "Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do with ECN)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi!

> So...I'm bummed. I'm assuming a 30% degradation in an app is probably
> not expected behavior? Swap usage is '0' in both OS's (i.e. it's not
> a run out of memory issue).

Vmware is _not_ application, it is dirty kernel hack. Do it without
vmware.
Pavel

-- 
I'm pavel@ucw.cz. "In my country we have almost anarchy and I don't care."
Panos Katsaloulis describing me w.r.t. patents at discuss@linmodems.org
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Pavel Machek: "Re: NTFS safety and lack thereof - Was: Re: Linux 2.4.0ac11"
Previous message: Andrew Morton: "Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do with ECN)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 31 2001 - 21:00:27 EST