Stefani Seibold wrote:
> The inline function is the best choice, because it it full compatible to old
> old printk. No side effects are expeted.
What is the difference?
I can't think of any difference between:
#define printk(format, args...) ((int) 0)
and:
static inline int printk_inline (void) { return 0; }
#define printk(format, args...) (printk_inline ())
If you wanted to be fully compatible in the sense of evaluating the
printk arguments, in case those have side effects, there would be:
#define printk(format, args...) ((0 , ## args), (int) 0)
By the way, CONFIG_NO_PRINTK or CONFIG_DISABLE_PRINTK would be better
names. CONFIG_PRINTK suggests that enabling that option enabled printk.
enjoy,
-- Jamie
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 31 2001 - 21:00:30 EST