Re: Version 2.4.1 cannot be built.

• Next message: Patrizio Bruno: "Re: Why isn't init PID 1?"
• Previous message: Rik van Riel: "Re: Version 2.4.1 cannot be built."
• In reply to: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: Version 2.4.1 cannot be built."
• Next in thread: James Sutherland: "Re: Version 2.4.1 cannot be built."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> ftp> ls mak*
>

> make:
>
> -rw-r--r-- 1 ftp ftp 1030393 Jun 24 2000 make-3.79.1.tar.gz
>

> ftp> get make-3.79.1.tar.gz
>

get make/make-3.79.1.tar.gz

You missed the make: it did just before it listed the contents of make/

Just tried it myself with make/make-3.79.1.tar.gz, works. Now, if i'd remembered to turn on bin mode, I'd have
a useable file.

Mike Dresser

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Patrizio Bruno: "Re: Why isn't init PID 1?"
• Previous message: Rik van Riel: "Re: Version 2.4.1 cannot be built."
• In reply to: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: Version 2.4.1 cannot be built."
• Next in thread: James Sutherland: "Re: Version 2.4.1 cannot be built."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 31 2001 - 21:00:39 EST