Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: ReiserFS Oops (2.4.1, deterministic, symlink
From: Alan Cox (alan@redhat.com)
Date: Fri Feb 02 2001 - 17:13:12 EST
- Next message: Manfred Spraul: "Re: [patch] 2.4.0, 2.4.0-ac12: APIC lock-ups"
- Previous message: Arthur Erhardt: "Re: [reiserfs-list] ReiserFS Oops (2.4.1, deterministic, symlink related)"
- In reply to: Hans Reiser: "Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: ReiserFS Oops (2.4.1, deterministic, symlink"
- Next in thread: Hans Reiser: "Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: ReiserFS Oops (2.4.1, deterministic, symlink"
- Reply: Hans Reiser: "Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: ReiserFS Oops (2.4.1, deterministic, symlink"
- Reply: David Woodhouse: "Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: ReiserFS Oops (2.4.1, deterministic, symlink"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
> my convenience matters as much as that of the users. I don't want to use
> #ifdefs, I want it to die explosively and verbosely informatively. make isn't
> the most natural language for that, but I am sure Yura can find a way.
Run a small shell check and let it fail if the shell stuff errors.
The fragment you want is
if [ -e /bin/rpm ]; then
X=`rpm -q gcc`
if [ "$X" = "gcc-2.96-54" ]; then
echo "*** GCC 2.96-54 will miscompile Reiserfs. Please update your compiler"
echo "See http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHBA-2000-132.html"
exit 255
fi
fi
> Please delay shipping the 3.0 CVS branch on RedHat for a while.:-) Sorry, I
> couldn't resist.
Grin. gcc 3.0 is going to be just as much fun Im sure, but finally should give
everyone a stable C and more importantly C++ base including the LSB standards.
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Next message: Manfred Spraul: "Re: [patch] 2.4.0, 2.4.0-ac12: APIC lock-ups"
- Previous message: Arthur Erhardt: "Re: [reiserfs-list] ReiserFS Oops (2.4.1, deterministic, symlink related)"
- In reply to: Hans Reiser: "Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: ReiserFS Oops (2.4.1, deterministic, symlink"
- Next in thread: Hans Reiser: "Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: ReiserFS Oops (2.4.1, deterministic, symlink"
- Reply: Hans Reiser: "Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: ReiserFS Oops (2.4.1, deterministic, symlink"
- Reply: David Woodhouse: "Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: ReiserFS Oops (2.4.1, deterministic, symlink"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29
: Wed Feb 07 2001 - 21:00:16 EST