Re: Unresolved symbols for wavelan_cs in 2.4.1-ac9

From: Rik van Riel (riel@conectiva.com.br)
Date: Sat Feb 10 2001 - 17:20:27 EST

Next message: Dunlap, Randy: "RE: Unresolved Symbol error"
Previous message: Mr. James W. Laferriere: "Re: Linux 2.4.1-ac7"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: Unresolved symbols for wavelan_cs in 2.4.1-ac9"
Next in thread: Dag Wieers: "Re: Unresolved symbols for wavelan_cs in 2.4.1-ac9"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat, 10 Feb 2001, Alan Cox wrote:

> > I noticed a single unresolved symbol in wavelan_cs.o and I fixed it as
> > described below.
>
> Rejected. It is meant not to be there.

To be more specific ... __bad_udelay() is meant to be an
unresolvable symbol, which is referenced when people call
udelay with a "wrong" timeout.

regards,

Rik

-- Linux MM bugzilla: http://linux-mm.org/bugzilla.shtml

Virtual memory is like a game you can't win; However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose...

http://www.surriel.com/ http://www.conectiva.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Dunlap, Randy: "RE: Unresolved Symbol error"
Previous message: Mr. James W. Laferriere: "Re: Linux 2.4.1-ac7"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: Unresolved symbols for wavelan_cs in 2.4.1-ac9"
Next in thread: Dag Wieers: "Re: Unresolved symbols for wavelan_cs in 2.4.1-ac9"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 15 2001 - 21:00:16 EST