Re: lkml subject line

From: Mohammad A. Haque (mhaque@haque.net)
Date: Tue Feb 13 2001 - 08:22:17 EST

Next message: Christoph Rohland: "Re: Linux 2.2.19pre10"
Previous message: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: 2.4.x SMP blamed for Xfree 4.0 crashes"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: lkml subject line"
Next in thread: Mike A. Harris: "Re: lkml subject line"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Some people keep telling me that the way mutt handles headers is
'broken'. I've looked at it myself and don't see anything wrong and no
one explains their accusations.

Anyone know anything about this or are they blowing hot air?

Alan Cox wrote:
>
> I've played with both pine and mutt. mutt is by the better mail system IMHO,
> but pine has an easier learning curve.

-- 
=====================================================================
Mohammad A. Haque                              http://www.haque.net/ 
                                               mhaque@haque.net
  "Alcohol and calculus don't mix.             Project Lead
   Don't drink and derive." --Unknown          http://wm.themes.org/
                                               batmanppc@themes.org
=====================================================================
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Christoph Rohland: "Re: Linux 2.2.19pre10"
Previous message: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: 2.4.x SMP blamed for Xfree 4.0 crashes"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: lkml subject line"
Next in thread: Mike A. Harris: "Re: lkml subject line"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 15 2001 - 21:00:21 EST