Re: Samba performance / zero-copy network I/O

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Wed Feb 14 2001 - 15:29:42 EST


> When reading the profiler results, the largest consuming kernel (calls?)
> are file_read_actor and csum_partial_copy_generic, by a longshot (about
> 70% and 20% respectively).
>
> Presumably, the csum_partial_copy_generic should be eliminated (or at
> least reduced) by David Miller's zerocopy patch, right? Or am I
> misunderstanding this completely? :)

To an extent, providing you are using the samba sendfile() patches. SMB cant
make great use of zero copy file I/O due to the fact its not really designed
so much as mutated over time and isnt oriented for speed

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 15 2001 - 21:00:25 EST