In article <20010221180035.N25927@athlon.random> you wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 02:49:17PM +1100, Richard Gooch wrote:
>> You definately can mknod(2) on devfs. [..]
> So then why don't we simply create the VG ourself with the right minor number
> and use it as we do without devfs? We'll still have a global 256 VG limit this
> way but that's not a minor issue.
Yes - that's how I did it in my inital LVM & devfs patches.
It would be really good to have something devfs-like just for LVM in
setups that don't use LVM, so we could avoid mounting root read/write
for device-creation.
One of the stronger points for a per-driver devfs, IHMO.
Christoph
-- Of course it doesn't work. We've performed a software upgrade. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 23 2001 - 21:00:25 EST