Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > > TCP _requires_ the remote end ack every 2nd frame regardless of progress.
> >
> > um, I thought the spec says that ACK every 2nd segment is a SHOULD not a
> > MUST?
>
> Yes its a SHOULD in RFC1122, but in any normal environment pretty much a
> must and I know of no stack significantly violating it.
I didn't know there was such a thing as a normal environment :)
> RFC1122 also requires that your protocol stack SHOULD be able to leap tall
> buldings at a single bound of course...
And, of course my protocol stack does :) It is also a floor wax, AND a
dessert topping!-)
rick jones
-- ftp://ftp.cup.hp.com/dist/networking/misc/rachel/ these opinions are mine, all mine; HP might not want them anyway... :) feel free to email, OR post, but please do NOT do BOTH... my email address is raj in the cup.hp.com domain... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 23 2001 - 21:00:28 EST