Re: [PATCH] s/isa//g in drivers/scsi/g_NCR5380.c and some cleanup (242)

From: Rasmus Andersen (rasmus@jaquet.dk)
Date: Sun Feb 25 2001 - 09:40:43 EST

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] s/isa//g in drivers/scsi/g_NCR5380.c and some cleanup (242)"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] s/isa//g in drivers/scsi/g_NCR5380.c and some cleanup (242)"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] s/isa//g in drivers/scsi/g_NCR5380.c and some cleanup (242)"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] s/isa//g in drivers/scsi/g_NCR5380.c and some cleanup (242)"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] s/isa//g in drivers/scsi/g_NCR5380.c and some cleanup (242)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

>
> Im running PIO. However while I agree with that one Im dubious about the
> inverts on the memcpy_*io bits
>

I am sorry but have I inverted the arguments to the memcpy_*io calls?
Or are you referring to something other than the arguments here?

-- Rasmus(rasmus@jaquet.dk)

"Science is like sex: sometimes something useful comes out, but that is not the reason we are doing it" -- Richard Feynman - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] s/isa//g in drivers/scsi/g_NCR5380.c and some cleanup (242)"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] s/isa//g in drivers/scsi/g_NCR5380.c and some cleanup (242)"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] s/isa//g in drivers/scsi/g_NCR5380.c and some cleanup (242)"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] s/isa//g in drivers/scsi/g_NCR5380.c and some cleanup (242)"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] s/isa//g in drivers/scsi/g_NCR5380.c and some cleanup (242)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 28 2001 - 21:00:09 EST