On Thu, 8 Mar 2001, Jesse Pollard wrote:
> james rich <james.rich@m.cc.utah.edu>:
> > On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Tom Sightler wrote:
> >
> > > 2. Does linux have any problems with large (500GB+) NFS exports, how about
> > > large files over NFS?
> > >
> > > 3. What filesystem would be best for such large volumes? We currently use
> > > reirserfs on our internal system, but they generally have filesystems in the
> > > 18-30GB ranges and we're talking about potentially 10-20x that. Should we
> > > look at JFS/XFS or others?
> >
> > I think that for filesystems this size you definately want to look at XFS
> > of JFS. Maybe you will decide not to use them - but you should test them.
> >
> > I am currently using XFS and it really works. It currently has some
> > issues when used with raid 1, but it is probably the most suited for what
> > you want. Exporting an XFS volume over NFS is no problem. You can also
> > use xfs_growfs to change the size of your XFS partition. I haven't had
> > any instability during all the time I've used XFS.
>
> The biggest difficulty I had with XFS (not on linux as a server) had
> more to do with NFS/XFS performance. The SGI clients worked fine while
> the Linux clients were about 10-20% slower. This was a year ago so this
> may not apply anymore. I haven't seen any Linux NFS benchmarks recently.
Recent changes in CVS appear to have resolved this issue.
James Rich
james.rich@m.cc.utah.edu
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 15 2001 - 21:00:08 EST