On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 09:15:33PM -0500, Alexander Viro wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, Chris Mason wrote:
> > Since fs/pipe.c:pipe_write() calls mark_inode_dirty, and it is legal to
> > write to a named pipe on a readonly filesystem, we can end up writing an
> > inode on a readonly FS.
>
> I would check that in pipe_write()...
So atime and mtime of a named pipe are meaningless in general?
That would make sense, since you cannot access the data anymore,
once they are through the pipe.
Regards
Ingo Oeser
--
10.+11.03.2001 - 3. Chemnitzer LinuxTag <http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/linux/tag>
<<<<<<<<<<<< been there and had much fun >>>>>>>>>>>>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 15 2001 - 21:00:15 EST