Re: static scheduling - SCHED_IDLE?

• Next message: John Jasen: "Re: magic device renumbering was -- Re: Linux 2.4.2ac20"
• Previous message: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: magic device renumbering was -- Re: Linux 2.4.2ac20"
• In reply to: Jamie Lokier: "Re: static scheduling - SCHED_IDLE?"
• Next in thread: Philipp Rumpf: "Re: static scheduling - SCHED_IDLE?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, Jamie Lokier wrote:

> > 2. load control, when the VM starts thrashing we can just
> > suspend a few processes to make sure the system as a
> > whole won't thrash to death
>
> Surely it would be easier, and more appropriate, to make the
> processes sleep when they next page fault.

This should work ...

Rik

--
Linux MM bugzilla: http://linux-mm.org/bugzilla.shtml
Virtual memory is like a game you can't win;
However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose...
		http://www.surriel.com/
http://www.conectiva.com/	http://distro.conectiva.com/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: John Jasen: "Re: magic device renumbering was -- Re: Linux 2.4.2ac20"
• Previous message: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: magic device renumbering was -- Re: Linux 2.4.2ac20"
• In reply to: Jamie Lokier: "Re: static scheduling - SCHED_IDLE?"
• Next in thread: Philipp Rumpf: "Re: static scheduling - SCHED_IDLE?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 15 2001 - 21:00:17 EST