Re: Incorrect mdelay() results on Power Managed Machines x86

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Fri Mar 23 2001 - 04:45:37 EST

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: Only 10 MB/sec with via 82c686b - FIXED"
Previous message: Riley Williams: "Re: [PATCH] Improved version reporting"
In reply to: Tim Wright: "Re: Incorrect mdelay() results on Power Managed Machines x86"
Next in thread: sfr@canb.auug.org.au: "Re: Incorrect mdelay() results on Power Managed Machines x86"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> If it's a 500MHz Thinkpad, then I'm guessing it's something like a 600X.
> That doesn't have Speedstep. The speed changes are done by some circuitry
> in the laptop. I can try to find out more if this would help.
> The newer machines are using Speedstep.

Any info on how the laptop wants to tell the OS about CPU speed changes that
we can hook into would be wonderful

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: Only 10 MB/sec with via 82c686b - FIXED"
Previous message: Riley Williams: "Re: [PATCH] Improved version reporting"
In reply to: Tim Wright: "Re: Incorrect mdelay() results on Power Managed Machines x86"
Next in thread: sfr@canb.auug.org.au: "Re: Incorrect mdelay() results on Power Managed Machines x86"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 23 2001 - 21:00:20 EST